May 15, 2026
There is a plethora of choices of door closer brands, types, sizes and finishes available on the market today – allowing nearly any door and décor to be well matched to a functional and legal closing device. There’s no reason why you can’t enhance every door with the benefit of a self-closing device.
There is a plethora of choices of door closer brands, types, sizes and finishes available on the market today – allowing nearly any door and décor to be well matched to a functional and legal closing device. There’s no reason why you can’t enhance every door with the benefit of a self-closing device.
In a perfect world, the principal architect, or specifier, would select the correct door closer and door for legal compliance, user experience and design aesthetics.
However, there are many circumstances where an alternative make of closer, that meets the same safety specification, is considered. Maybe the fitter can’t get hold of the exact same brand, or if an existing closer on a fire door has failed, it needs replacing urgently to restore building safety. We’ve known it when regional availability or supply shortages have presented fit-out contractors or facilities maintenance staff with a dilemma. Another challenge for facilities managers can be existing door closers not providing the performance required to overcome air-pressures, or ease of opening to assist less-able residents.
Fire compliance is probably one of the most important considerations when choosing an alternative door closer. Third-party certification of door closers is a recognised and generally respected way to ascertain door closer ‘fire rating’ and what particular door types that closer can be fitted to. If the fire door was originally supplied as a complete doorset assembly, and you can identify the manufacturer, then its Field of Application and EXAP and classification reports will help you select the correct replacement closer. These reports (obtainable from the manufacturer) relate to a particular fire door core or system, detailing tested and permitted door closers, and if possible, what alternative door closer can be used. In Field of Application Reports, alternative door closers are sometimes permitted under a caveat like this:
“Alternative face fix door closers must be tested to BS EN 1154, suitably CE/UKCA marked and Certifire approved.”
| ARROW | ASSA | BOSS | BRITON IR | DORMA | HOPPE | GEZE | RUTLAND | SYNERGY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 434 | – | TS4.224 | 2003 | TS 71 | AR 6800 | TS 1000C / TS 1500 | TS.3204 | S150.MEC |
| – | – | TS4.224 | – | – | AR 8200 | – | TS.3204BC | – |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | TS.4204DABC | S500 |
| 325VP/BC | DC200 | TS4224V | 1120B | TS 72VBC | AR 1500/3500 | TS 2000NV | TS.5204BC | S600 |
| – | – | – | – | TS83BC | AR 3500 | – | TS.5204DABC | S610 |
| 325 | – | TS5.225 | – | TS83VBC | AR 8300/8500 | – | TS.9205BC | S800 |
| – | – | TS5.225 | – | TS 83VBC | AR 8300/8500 | – | TS.9205DABC | S810 |
| 516 | DC340 | TS5.226 | 2130B | TS83VBC | AR 9200/9500 | TS4000S | TS.9206DABC | S900 (no DA) |
| – | – | TS.5225SA | – | – | AR 8209 | – | TS.24 | – |
| 324 | DC500 | TS6224 | 2300 | TS 91/2 | AR 6409 | TS 3000B | TS.11204 | S3401 |
| – | DC700 | TS.6225 | – | TS 93 | AR 6509 | – | TS.11205 | S3501 |
| C24V | – | ITS6224 | 2400 2-4 | ITS 96 2-4 | AR 7383 | Boxer 2-4 | ITS.11204 | S1000 |
| – | DC860 | ITS6225 | – | ITS 96 3-6 | – | Boxer 3-6 | ITS.11205 | S1036 |
| – | – | TS3.003/4 TS6003/FS |
2820 | BTS 80/84 | AR 700 | TS500N | TS.700 3/4 | S4003/S4004 |
| – | FS14V | – | – | BTS 75V | AR 760 | TS 500NV | TS.7104 | S4014 |
| – | – | TS8.003 | – | RTS 85 | – | – | TS.8004 | S5803/S5804 |
| 623 | – | TS7004 | 996 | TS.73 EMF | AR 1998 | – | Responder 24 | – |
| BM3SE-HO | – | – | – | – | – | TS.3000E | TS.Firetrak.114 | S3401.EHO/S3406.EHO |
| – | – | – | – | TS.99 | – | – | TS.Firetrak.115 | S3501.EHO/S3506.EHO |